Palm Treo 600 and 650 Notice of Class Action Settlement (Palza Case)
If you purchased a Palm Treo 600 or Treo 650 in the United States and found it to be defective click here to tell us what happened, enter yor information into our database, and possibly participate in a current class action case. To view the Notice of Class Action Settlement please visit the Palza Settlement Web Site.
---->Click here to suggest a new Case
Case Documents of Interest
Free Speech Coalition v. Utah Complaint (alleging federal preempted e-mail registry statute)
Palza v. Palm, Inc.
Class Action Complaint (alleging inherently defective Treo PDA devices and breach of warranties)
Parke v. Cardsystems Solutions, Inc. Class Action Complaint (alleging negligent data security of consumer credit card transactions)
Cisneros v. Yahoo et al Class Action Complaint (Net Gambling Ads)
Baker v. Microsoft et al
Complaint on behalf of the General Public (Consumer Software Shrinkwrap Agreements and Return Policies)
Judnick v. DoubleClick Nationwide Class Action Settlement (Alleged Privacy Intrusions Related to Web Bugs and Tracking Consumer Internet Activities)
In re RIAA
Complaint and Settlement on behalf of the General Public (Amnesty Program Alleged a Deceptive Business Practice)
Newmark v. Turner Broadcasting et al.
Complaint, Oral Argument Transcript, and Court Order in Favor of Consumers
(ReplayTV Case Involving Commercial Skipping, Time Shifting, and Space Shifting on DVR Devices)
Retailers National Bank et al. (Visa and Mastercard) v. Harding
Cross Complaint (Alleging Internet Gambling Credit Card Debts are Unenforceable)
The information supplied on this web site is general in nature and should not be relied upon to make legal decisions. Interacting with e-mail, forms, or online forums on this web site does not constitute the creation of an attorney/client relationship. This web site is an advertisement for legal services. The examples of client cases and results discussed on this web site are not a guarantee of your outcome if we represent you in a particular case.
MP3Board search engine defends itself against allegations from the RIAA and Major Recording Studios regarding the issue of whether or not mere passive hyperlinking arising out of Internet search engine results can constitute secondary copyright infringement in Arista Records et al. v. MP3Board, Inc./ MP3Board, Inc. v. RIAA.
Admin
View Printer Friendly Version
Email Article to Friend